It is typical of the current PR-headed power center to come up with an expression like "War on Terror" which is semantically null, names no enemy, and abuses the concept of war by posing in a ridiculous stance that has no end to it. Does Bush think "terror" is going to surrender, or sign a document committing to the end of hostilities?

By steering the nation into an untenable posture of war against a non-entity (terror is not an identity on whom one can wage war, after all) Mister Bush has craftily undercut the workings of the nation WITHOUT solving the problem with which the nation is confronted. This is why I continuously question his competence.

A