DB says: "And I see where people here say he should be impeached, I see others asking for a reason, like, what law has he broken, and the former never coming up with an answer. Instead, they insist the economy is bad while ignoring that economists who say it is great. Losing jobs overseas is another of their false jabs at Bush, ignoring the fact that Congress passed a major bill in 1974 to provide for job growth and job retraining due to Technology change and the globalization of our economy."

Interesting that YOU have decided that bush has not broken the law, that the economy is not bad, that the cynical outsourcing of jobs is good - when that investigation and report is not completed. Get a big towel because you may need it to wipe that mud off your face.

DB says: "I guess I am going to stick with the idea that WJC was such a do-nothing President and was into the party scene, (the reason for the two hugh tents on the grounds of the Whitehouse during his tenure - WJC had more state dinners in his first 5 weeks of office than GWB hosted in his 5 years), that many are embarrassed and find their only recourse is to try to discredit this President. The DC press corps has gone on record that the party scene in DC is almost nil since WJC left office and even thought they are left leaning, perhaps the lack of free booze has caused them to be even more cynical."

That argument is plain silly. Clinton made connections with world leaders - and garnered respect from them. Clinton held press conferences- the bush is afraid of them. (No real surprise there- his handlers are scared of letting him wing it. With good reason. The man can't put five sentences together and have four of them make sense.) Take a look at how often the bush has gone home to the "ranch" (you won't find animals there, folks) in these five years in comparison with what other presidents have done. As for booze swilling- how many of our presidents have been dry drunks?

You are silly.