The Mudcat Café TM
Thread #89208   Message #1684514
Posted By: Bagpuss
03-Mar-06 - 04:17 PM
Thread Name: BS: zodiac/star signs.. do you believe?
Subject: RE: BS: zodiac/star signs.. do you believe?
Okey Dokey.

Well I can honestly say that none of the profiles sounded particularly like me. None of them hit on any of what I consider to be key aspects of my personality. Some had some minor bits that could describe me, but equally some contained bits that were really unlike me. I won't bother mentioning bits that were neither like nor unlike me.

Profile 1: 3/10
The bits that fitted were about being friendly and sensitive and liking my comforts and empathising with others. Also the bit about me having an intellectual core. The bits about desire to rule, organise and hold keys to authority are nothing like me, ditto for the willpower bit.

Profile 2: 2/10
First section extemely unlike me, except perhaps the morbid imagination bit. Inclination to extremes, again unlike me. Love of nature is correct, but not extroverted, demonstrative etc.

Profile 3: 4/10
Organizational ability, definitely not. The only bit in the first section that rang true was keen observer of human nature (I studied psychology). Abition, persistence, willpower etc - totally wrong. Tendency towards scepticism, correct. Prudence in love life section fairly accurate, same with being economical in daily activities.

Profile 4: 3/10
First section same as for 2, so again, couldn't be more unlike me. Second section. Second section - Not an extremes sort of person, and not attracted to the occult or psychic phemomena particularly. Passionately attached to those I love, but conversely, NOT fixed in dislikes. Inclination towards medicine is correct, but definitely not surgery. Definitely attracted by research and investigation.

So I didn't feel any of them fitted me like a glove, but if forced to choose, number 3 was least unlike me.

Bring on the result...

Bagpuss