No, I don't think it justifies any high level of certainty, I just think it's interesting and should not be rejected out of hand.

You see, most people still tend to believe what they want to believe. And that determines which side of the argument they will immediately rush to support whenever something like this is mentioned. They have an emotional predilection either toward or against the unconventional or the unusual or the "unconfirmed".

That's what's interesting. Why are some people more comfortable only with the confirmed while others are naturally enthusiastic about the hypothetical?