Yes Paul, I was being kind about the presentation of the results, as they are nonsensicle without the rest of the study.... But to be fair, gauquelin did find some positive results there (as well as some negative ones), but as described below, they seem to have been wholly explainable by artifacts and biases. Which will mean nothing to a non scientist astrology follower (please note how I manage to conduct this discussion without calling anyone names or making snide comments), so they will continue to blindly believe that this provides support for astrology.