basically cos its bollocks. one bloke saying he doesn't like Bush isn't liberal bias. he's not all that likeable. his politics probably aren't that much different from his opponent. there really isn't much to dislike or like - he's a politician.

Gerry Adams denied the right to speak on english tv for years.
Arthur Scargil sneered at throughout the miners strike, when the situation was far more complex than the british broadcasting cocksuckers could appreciate. that was bias.

why would that gang of oxbridge boors be biassed any other way?