Roger,

You constantly complain that posters do not offer points for discussion, but confine their posts to personal judgement of yourself.

I have posted many times to ask you to respond to very specific questions, and have yet to receive one reply, in your own words, to said direct questions.

I have a few questions to put to you now, asked out of a genuine desire to know the answers.

1. Is it your contention that clones, who are members of this community, should be debarred from expressing their opinions on this site for as long as they hold editing authority?

2. By what process of thought do you arrive at the conclusion that knowing exactly which members hold that authority will ensure its more even handed use?

3. Who are the "many" you constantly refer to, who, according to you are concerned about the level of "censorship" on this forum?

4. Why do you persist in suggesting that those who disagree with your basic argument should go elsewhere, while claiming that any who suggest the same course to you are guilty of bullying? You seem to be thoroughly dissatisfied with the management of this site, which would seem to be a good reason to do as you suggest to others, and set up your own.

No personal judgements in there, Roger, so might I now expect to receive four direct answers please?

Don T.