Here's the Babelfish translation of the above.



I have a sight on a subject that some the few posters evidently do not want that other posters argue _ before to simply ignore to screw to contain quarrel on subject this that little to always seem to think that they to have to have a certain control that another poster to choose to designate and a certain right to demand that another one not to designate does not stop arguing that they to be able to choose. Nobody is not forced to open any wire but these some posters would seem to think only because they do not desire to argue this subject - this gives certain right to them to continue to public designate personal judgments of its posters of comrade and to speculer on each aspect of the comrade poster who if necessarily discloses to be its current target in order to hinder the quarrel to this respect. I wait that it will accept that I or any another poster forced to stop the quarrel on any subject of its choice or to cease to very designate for this táctica that intimidates - it is that seguidamente this uncertain táctica and the "rule of multitude ' would have been seen to have success to its objecto? Perhaps it is of times that this little is stimulated officially to go noutro place, where this conduction that intimidates acceptable would be thought - before she is authorized to deliver this to intimidating, placing this example and to present the remaining portion of ours fórum to the this. For it has the result to only hinder other posters it feeling freely to designate that they choose - or perhaps to desire equal to contribute here for such conditions. Perhaps all the posters can be stimulated to accept that the only order finally that - or it must have - have been above of the text of its proper poles and that they do not have no right to hinder others to designate that they choose?

LOL
Don T.