It is the TEST that I do not see as being valid as showing the existance of a creator- NOT the results that I might or might not get.

?? Well, if you don't think the test itself is valid in any way shape or form, how could you see any results as valid??

I don't quite see what you're getting at. Did you think I was trying to be original? People have been doing 'tests' like this for thousands of years, at least! I've found that when I want the pleasure, benefit and comfort of a tangible, subjective, and yes very personal relationship with the 'divine Essence of the universe' (ie 'Creator'), expressing sincere and joyful gratitude as often as possible is the most reliable way to achieve that 'connection'.

But if an objectively valid, empirically repeatable, peer-reviewable, scientifically approvable 'proof' of 'Creator' is the only thing that will satisfy that hunger for truth, well, you're setting yourself up for starvation so to speak. Such a thing is still humanly impossible on this planet, at this time. And this may never change.