I think we would all agree (wouldn't we?) that communities have SOME right to limit what goes on in them. So where would YOU draw the line?

I think when what is being risked is more than what is to be gained.

This does not seem to be an intentional attempt to prevent House Concerts - but that looks as if it will be the result.

Perhaps attention should be paid only when or if an individual event does in fact cause some measurable problem. Then steps can be taken to address this rather than placing he whole thing at risk.