I did find the pasting of Joe's comment specifically dealing with editing of PMs as a "proof" that Joe lied about editing of public thread posts somewhat offensive, but not surprising.

I think perhaps what is surprising is how selective some posters can be about what they find offensive? It is not seemingly offensive conduct for a poster to be subjected to personal judgements and abuse from a so-called moderator but it would appear to be offensive for the victim to quote it as the firm evidence of this conduct.

For without providing such evidence - these offensive posts from moderators are publicly denied' minimised or justified.

Given the extent and nature of many of the personal judgements encouraged to be publicly made about this fellow posters by the usual suspects over this long time - it is probably understandable for a 'newer' poster to assume there is some real justification for such a concerted reaction.................The fact is there isn't. I just hold, express and evidence a different view.

But I do not see the 'comment specifically dealing with editing of PMs' - that you find so offensive. Nor the accusation of mine that you refer to.

Perhaps you could clear this up?