Your constant barrage of anti-Mudcat posts has effectively squelched legitimate discussion of Mudcat policy - because YOU twist every such discussion toward yourself.

What would the Chief of the Mudcat Editing team consider to be an anti-Mudcat post?

It would appear that is encouraged to be any view that is a different one to that expressed by the Chief of the Mudcat Editing Team.

Who would only appear to be happy with our forum - by needing to constantly impose changes and restrictions to further judge and inhibit his fellow posters in order to shape every aspect of our forum to his requirements.

Who can have no real interest in preventing posters from personal attacks - as to succeed in this will mean that there is then no excuse and cover for this constant tinkering, ordering and fixing of things that are not broken.

In fact no one can now legitimatly question Mudcat policy without this being portrayed as a personal attack on the poster who is currently the Chief of the Mudcat Editing Team - because they have become one and the same thing.