The only people capable of dealing with these debates at all are some of the ones who are affected, AND who are trusted by the owner and respected by a majority of the parties.

An interesting principle to try and introduce to the rest of the world, where logic is still valued. Sounds a bit like a good old Wild West Posse - complete with weapons.............

Bill why are juries so carefully selected and vetted to ensure that they are not directly (indectly) affected or trusted or by any of the parties?

Would it be so that that any settlement can be seen to have been conducted without prejudice to either party and as a result, respected by ALL?