"For protecting us from abusive persoanl attacks is SUPPOSED to be why they are in the kitchen - not to sit in and impose their judgement on everyone else and to consider that for them to be judged in return is UNFAIR."

Tell me it isn't true, Roger. Are you admitting judging them?

But you never respond in kind. You've said so dozens of times;..... no, make that hundreds of times.

Now, it would be possible for anyone here to start enough threads to push all your stuff off the bottom of this numbers limited list. Of course they would kill off everyone else's threads as collateral damage.

If somebody did that, would you still hold the view that they should not be stopped?

We ALL need to be moderated (not censorship) if we step over the line that marks a move into actions that are unreasonable, and, before you ask, yes, that means unreasonable in the opinion of those appointed to moderate.

You can use emotive terms as often as you like, but sensible editing is NOT censorship.

Before you respond that your actions are not unreasonable in the same way as my example, count the number of threads currently devoted to Roger's campaign against the evil elves, and deduct one. The result is the number of threads you are currently excluding from the list.

The one you deducted represents the number actually required to further your sacred cause.

Just once, give some thought to this, and consider whether claims of unreasonable behaviour ARE, as you would like to think, unjustified.

Joe Offer even stated that ONE thread was not to be deleted or closed, to ensure that you COULD continue. Do you need the dictionary definition of "hint".

Don T.