Not to mention that these people are given a set of guidelines to follow and their actions are subject to at least two levels of review. Judgement is involved - the implication that it is personal and private judgement is false.

Ask Bert.

http://www.mudcat.org/detail.cfm?messages__Message_ID=1707797

But if any of you are accused of personally motivated editing actions (against a poster you publicly rail against like me for example) - what defence can you have to convince our forum that it was not personally motivated?