your point? those are not deletions or censoring. they are joe's stated opinions regarding your actions, signed with his name - they are not anonymous attacks. In fact, they are not "attacks" at all when, when taken in context.

MMario I do not consider you to be a fool but your determination to defend, justfy and excuse online behaviour and the examples set more than once by the Chief of the Mudcat Editing Team - that you would accept if this same individual had imposed editing action on exactly the same online behaviour - is making you look foolish.

By repeatedly displaying it, the stubborn attempt to justify this behaviour and showing no inclination to apolgise to our forum for it nor any commintment to change it - the current Chief of the Mudcat Editing Team has also made it impossible for any of his team. For this stance will destroy any remaining credibility this 'system' may once had been able to claim.

Which is a shame as I have never doubted the honest good intentions of all the participants - just the inablity of this well-intended 'system' to deliver anything but more division on our forum.