You can't make any criticism of the current 'system' without the individual fellow posters concern becoming sensitive and taking this personally. So what you get is a whole lot of criticism in return from these individuals some of them attacking you in return for the assumed personal attack they think you are making on them. even when you do not know who they are.....

My critism of those anonymous editors is not of them personally but of the devisive 'system' that results in this - them and us situation. Although I do not understand why some appear to be happy to nothing to prevent their fellow editors from excusing, justifying and defending examples of conduct that bring their own integrity into question.

But I still don't ' really see anything that could be thought 'nice' about anyone wanting to be in a position or to feel themselves qualified to imposed the judgement on their fellow posters. And to also wish to do it anonymously is something I really don't understand. Perhaps the problem is that the role has moved from simply being one of helping other posters when they requested this - to something else?