"Keep arguing, bb... Yer arguing against yerself... "


No, I am arguing against statements made without refence to the facts.

"You have no idea of the premise I have presented and you have no idea about dealing with Arabs..."

Than you have failed entirely to present a valid premise, since I have addressed what YOU have stated.


"If you do, then please eleaborate..."

The statement you made has been demonstarted to be false, under the public information available, and a worst case extreme picked out of the air.

"And, BTW, volume (as in numbers of posts) doesn't win debates... Ideas do and I haven't heard the first one from you other than right wing spin about how Iran is the big, bad wolf..."

I have heard no solution from you- just rants about Bush. I DO NOT
HAVE a solution- but I see that YOU depend on the goodness of the Iranian Government to stop a nuclear war.


"And BTW. Part 2, just because you may *******think******* that Israels nuclear strenght is "public domain" don't make it so.... There was a time when Iraq was thought to have all these ansty weapons, as well..."

So, You imply Israel DOES NOT have the nuclear weapons YOU are depending on to keep Iran from attacking????

"You seem perfectly willing to accept as fact anything that might support yer arguments yet unwilling to accept the fact that facts ain't always, ahhhhhh, facts..."

You have yet to present any facts, whatsoever. When you do, I will treat them as I would any other fact.

"This seem to be a pettern with you... No offense intended... Jus' tryin' to break yer cycle of acceptin' inforamtion carte blanche that supporst yer opinions as facts..."

I try to find the MOST LIKELY set of facts, NOT the ones that, by being extreme, would support one viewpoint or the other.

"But back to ideas fir now.... What, if you were the presdient would you do about Iran (other than spin the Bush company fight song)???"

I would have the UN embargo ALL imports in and out of Iran, and wait for the mushroom clouds.

WHat the hell would you do?