Bobert,

"No, I made my arguments, Bruce..."

Which I read, and responded dierectly to.

" You just dismissed them because you didn't like them... "

A FALSE statement on your part- I provided facts that showed that your arguements were NOT supported by facrts, and invited you to provide facts to back them up

"All you wanted to do was engage me in a pointless debate about how manhy angels can dance on the end of a pin..."

THAT is YOUR effort not mine.

"Then you, in yer twisted manner, havin' not really responded to anything I said other than your standard mantra of expecting me to "PROVE" somethin' that is basically unproveable "

WHAT did I NOT respond to? PLEASE give me an example.


"and when I told you that and gave you an example (cigarettes and cancer) you twisted by answer to insinuate that I supported genocide???"

I stated that YOU have the same level of support for genocide as YOU have, without any facts, sstated that Martin and Bush have. I then invited you to provide some support for YOUR accusations, which YOU have NOT done.


That, sir, was insulting and no mre productive than anything that Martin Gibson might throw into a discussion...

So, YOU have the right to make unfounded accusations, and have YOUR opinions accepted as fact without support, while those who disagree with you do not?