CarolC,

"I refuted it, beardedbruce, when I told you that it is not necessary to blanket the entire area of Iran with nuclear bombs to completely destroy it. And I provided a valid example to back up my assertion."


The present existance of the Afghan people proves you wrong.

Your TELLING me something does not make it true.

Ihave firsthand knowledge of NATO installations that were considered "a-bomb proof" ( In Europe)- They were expected to survive a nuclear strike, and be able to resume operations. That was in the 1970's- I think that the Iranians are more than capable of having such now.

As noted in another thread, the MAJORITY in Iran DOES NOT support the mullahs- BUT the 10% or so that does HAS CONTROL. So, why would the Mullahs care if say, 60% of the population was killed, as long as THEY kept alive?

You have NOT refuted my arguement.