"Has the Chief of the Mudcat Editing Team repeatedly judged your worth in public over many years, posted abusive personal attacks upon you, called you names like idiot, looney buffoon and asshole and encouraged other posters to follow this example? "

No, I don't think he has any reason to. If I ever acted in a way that deserves it, I guess he would. He is allowed to after all.

"You may not care about others having to be subject to such treatment - but should receiving your unasked for judgement really be expected to bother me?"

On the contrary, you did ask for my "judgement" when you posted in a this forum.   Posting of such a nature are open to response, based on the judgement of the owners of this site.

I am not trying to "bother" you either. IF you consider anyone that has a civil conversation with you to be bothering you, then you might have an issue with paranoia.

"The point of course is that the Mudlogic our forum is seriously being asked to accept is that despite the Chief of the Mudcat Editing team's repeated abusive personal attacks on me - that any editing actions on my posts are not personally motivated. "

And if you took a poll, I am sure the majority of posters would feel that you are not on the receiving end of "repeated abusive personal attacks", nor would we feel that any action has been "personally motivated" beyond the obvious motivation that all actions require.