>>I have done exacly what you asked of me AR282. What else can I do to get you to respond? Or was my attack on your argument not to your liking either?<<

Are you asking me to prove Roman royals created the Christian religion as we know it? This what I mean about changing the subject. that was never what this thread was about. this thread is about the historicity of Jesus Christ. I've you my reasons why I don't there was any such person. You've given me two things that I've refuted. If you have anything else, I'd like to see it. If my refutations are wrong then I'd like to see that too.

As for my assertions that Roman royals created the religion, I can't prove that beyond the changes Constantine made (helping to compile canon and moving Sabbath to Sunday). While it is my burden of proof, I'm not demanding you accept it. I could easily be wrong. That was never what this dispute was about. You are once again attempting to change the subject.

WHAT IS YOUR EVIDENCE JESUS WAS HISTORICAL?

THAT is the subject of this thread. If you don't buy the Roman royal theory that's fine. I'm demanding you accept it. It is my conclusion based on my researches over the years. I never said it was proven by anyone much less me.

Please stick to the subject.