Hey, we all are looking at Hitler with 20-20 hindsight here... And we are aslo looking at the 1939 Hitler, not the 1936 Hitler...

Things change and evolve based on circumstance...

Lets say that 9/11 hadn' toccured... How many folks really think that Bush would have been able to win, which is questionable, the 2004 election??? Prior of 9/11 Bush's poll numbers were allready headin' South... Like I said: "circumstances"...

And I agree with John that Bush is no Adolf Hitler but his handlers have used many of the same tactics that Hityler's folks used... Problem, for Bush, is that he and his corrupt buddies have been caught too many times with their hands in the middle classe's wallets...

But, their failures to match Hitler's success shouldn't over-shadow the similar tactics used by both to centralize power...

And, fir the record, this ain't a rant... Just observations... Fir folks who have read my rants they know that this post is mild as branch water... Just observations...

Bobert