Do you not think it disingenuous for any Mudcatter to post under a deliberately anonymous name.

Well shambles, I normally disagree entriely on the moderation/admin issues you raise including the clones acting anonymously.

I will concede on this one that while I couldn't really care less, the idea of a member having an anonymous name to post as a member but does their duties anonymously with no name and persumably has another Mudcat member name which they don't use anonymously, etc. or however you work it out - I confuse myself thinking about it does seem somewhat odd to me.