Why get your knickers in a twist by assuming what the 'intent' of a deletion may be?

As you have no evidence that the many and various forms of imposed censorship upon mine and other's contributions, are not malicious or personally motivated why would you assume (as you obviously appear to do and in face of the evidence to the contrary) that they never are? should you not at least be giving the victims the benefit of the doubt?

My knickers are less twisted about any assumptions than they are about the actuality of imposed judgements made and encouraged based only on assumptions about possible intent.

If all posters were openly to be seen to receive equal treatment - there would be little need for any judgements and assumptions to be made.

Where normal logic applies - in cases where there was ANY question that one individual may be seen to be recieving special and personlly motivated treatment from another in a position of trust and responsibility - the latter would remove themselves from any dealings.

Unlike this thread - where you will see that all other 'moderators' have been warned off.............