Because people would argue against the decision.

Should not they be seen to still be able to do this?

And why would be seen to be harmful or 'exacerbate the trouble caused'?

Possibly they may have a point?

Possibly they may only wish to argue with its silent imposition?

Possibly if our forum could see where all forms of imposed censorship had taken place - posters would be in an informed position to judge if its current nature and level and the being price paid for this ' was really necessary?

Possibly some mutual agreement could have been reached prior to any impostion being judged as necessary?