Fair call on the renaming, Joe.

Graham do you really consider your 'background' summary of events in the first post to be a complete or a fair one?

If I didn't, I wouldn't have posted it...

Re-reading, "campaign" may be a loaded word, as it may imply a reason. Let's leave aside your reasons, and simply agree that you have done this, persistently, for two years. There is ample evidence for this, at least.

It is perfectly clear that dispite the evidence - you do not consider me to simply be a victim of personally motivated and selective censorship action.

Please provide the evidence.

As of late 2005, Joe *did* insult you. By that point, you'd been doing this (mass copying and quoting) for over a year. No limitation on what you could do was imposed on you until 18 months after you'd started. I'd like you to show how this was personally motivated, because I don't believe anyone had personal motivation to dislike you until long after you'd started doing this, thereby *causing* the dislike.

Graham.