If you are "very liberal toward the care of the less fortunate", why does that not include illegal immigrants already in the US, who want a path to citizenship--(without leaving the US first)--, which you damn as "amnesty"--and oppose? As citizens, or even people demonstrably on the path to citizenship, they would be much less exploitable. But either you don't see this or you don't really care if they are exploited.

So your "liberalism" is suspect.