"Subject: RE: BS: Jihad: Definition
From: GUEST,thehw - PM
Date: 28 Aug 06 - 01:01 AM

Well, yes, the excuse that some other country's leader is a "maniac" or a "madman" sounds like a wonderful way to justify pre-emptively attacking a country which hasn't attacked you yet. It's been done before on several occasions, and people bought it every time. So why not do it again? Remember, when others do it...it's a war crime! But when you do it...it's justifiable defence against future aggression by "a maniac"! Who can argue with such impeccable logic as that?"

You, shithead, have taken what I said out of context. For that, go fuck yourself.