"Bin Laden says he did it. Bush says Bin laden did it. The video evidence says he did it. The engineering studies show how it happened, and back up the obvious conclusion."

I am prone to believe the engineering studies (but they can also be bribed) more than I am to believe either Bush or Bin Laden. Why would you believe either? A false premise does not lead to the truthful conclusion.

...and Mick -

Your comment above shows your need to 'trash', not mine.

btw - I've made no judgement about what happened to the twin towers but I am smart enough not to draw conclusions based on 'blind faith'.

How do you know that Bush and Bin laden have not colluded?

How do you explain the fact that the U.S. military is more interested in Iraqi politics than finding Bin Laden?