Dianavan:

It has nothing to do with Abu Ghraib. You did not answer the question in the proper thread. You ignored it in other threads. Which thread should I ask it in so you will give an answer?

You state that the U.S./Britain/Israel should resume diplomatic relations and begin to address the concerns of a party that is clearly bloodthirsty.

Please expalin how this concern can be addressed. If you don't know how it can be addressed, why are you saying that it should be addressed?

"Why would I even want to think twice about what an extreme, religious fundamentalist has to say?" You say U.S./Britain/Israel should but you don't want to even think about it. Why not?