Keef,
He who provides the most links doesn't win the war.

I haven't provided any links. This is a perfect example of how you look here.

An opinion from a fire investigation expert would be most helpful.


There have been numerous experts testify to this. Yours is a poorly executed debaters tactic, in which you make an assertion that simply isn't true and state it as if it were an irrefutable fact.

You will probably reject any information that does not confirm your entrenched viewpoint. That is human nature.
Perhaps I'm not human.
I like to modify my viewpoint as information comes to hand.


Pretty arrogant statement on your part. You make assumptions about me without any proof to that effect. This might come as a surprise to you given that you seem to know more than the rest of us mere mortals, but I gave a lot of my time investigating the sources given by folks here, particularly Donuel's, because I have always enjoyed his view on things. What I came to was that there was no credible evidence that 9/11 was anything but what it was reported to be.

I do not question your ancestry or intelligence because you see things from a different perspective to me.

Read it again. Tell me where I questioned your ancestry. What I did do was point out the image you are presenting. And in your response, you once again with these statements, give the same appearance.