Jon, I had the same reaction

Would you care to post to our forum and actually discuss what exactly you find the problem is with that post?

Do you have no problem with selective measures like 'silent deletion and thread closures being imposed only to prevent and inhibit posting - being dressed-up as noble sounding attempts to enable reasonable discussion?

Or 'moderators' indulging and encouraging the very conflict on our forum that they constantly and publicly complain about, when they have publicly admitted the failure of the censorship action that they still continue to impose?

Do you have a problem with the following suggestion?

In order to protect all parties - can I again request that all posters be seen to be treated equally and openly on our forum by those who would feel themselves qualified to impose their judgement on us?

And that all editing comments are seen to be limited to where some form of imposed censorship has actually taken place and that an editing comment is ALWAYS provided to indicate where, why and when such action has been judged necessary?