Hey Bobert:

I have never disputed any of your findings, only your conclusion.

Something is making you blind to the facts. If it is not hatred, what is it.

Do you agree that if the Democrats had kept their mouth shut, FEMA would have been left alone? You know it is true but you can't agree so you shift the focus on the fact that the result of their whining was less than satisfactory because of Bush. If the Democrats think FEMA could function poperly under DHS, why do they want to separate it again? The reason is it can't function the way it did when it is one of 22 agencys under FEMA.

I come up with a satement by and official of the corps of engineers that even if bush had funded them 100% the levees would have failed.

You ignore it and you just go back to harping that the levees faild because GWB underfunded the ACOE.

Do you know more than the officials of the ACOE?

There was a documentary that studied the failures from an engineering standpoint. I directed you to it. You did not pay any attention. It said in essence that the city was doomed, is still doomed, will always be doomed and it will have to be abandoned someday. It went into great detail about the soil and construction but you cannot be bothered with details.

So just keep repeating over and over on about Bush and Brownie and all the paper you printed out ETC.

Your conclusion is still wrong. Your research was objective and not subjective. Your objective is to heap it all on Bush. Ooooh that makes you feel good. All the while you and your business are benefiting form the economic climate created by the Bush administration after the bursting of the bubble during the Clinton administration.

I could understand if your whining if your net worth was shrinking or your business was doing poorly.

I recently talked to a man that owns a millwork company and he told me he has never seen such a good economy. To put it into his words "Business is better than I have ever seen it"

Do you agree with that?