or the other option, leave things the way they are.   The majority of posters seem to have no problem with that.

If this were the case - would this 'I'm alright Jack' attitude really mean that the current 'system' was seen to be impartial and all poster were equally treated?

If this were the case - would it mean that its main architect's admission of the current systems failure can be safely ignored?

As I have pointed out and as it has been ignored - there is no way any poster can make an informed judgement on the true nature and current level of imposed censorship on our form. Not until every such action is indicated and explained with an editing comment and all editing comments are limited to where this has been judged to be necessary.