I think what Guest 5.51 is suggesting that mother/childminder should be interchangeable. If you would take that action against someone paid to take care of your daughter where is the problem with taking the action against the child's mother?

I can't say that I altogether agree with the premise - there is a difference in the degree of connection between the two. However, I do think that mother needs to be 'sacked' in her own way for the sake of the little girl.