This is the least important aspect of Kat's post. To focus on it to the possible detriment of the thread (by redirecting the focus of the reader from the issues being discussed to the issue you have chosen to raise) is deeply offensive in light of the subject matter of the thread.

You may find this to be the least important part of the post I responded to - you have posted to provide your reasons for why you judge this to be so. I don't find this deeply offensive, as this is your view and you are welcome to express it in any thread you wish to (unlike me). You are also welcome to do this as a non - member of our forum (perhaps not for very much longer). Although what the point of posting such a judgement on a post responding to a comment - and not the original comment itself - escapes me. But it does follow a pattern.

I think it deeply offensive to our forum that some anonymous fellow poster (possibly kat herself) is permitted to now judge and silently delete, move, re-title my posts and those of others and provide no evidence or explanation for this imposed action - in the form of an editing comment.

Unlike us - at least kat knows for sure that the non-appearance of her post - is not due to it being silently deleted.