I think realistically you're probably right memyself.

It is a great speech, but it kind of rates as "what you should have said was ...".

You know, when two people exchange disparaging witticisms and one goes off, having been bullied off the court by his stupider but bigger opponent, saying to his friends "what I should have said was ..."

These kind of things can be great, but this looks like being an anthem for the outraged rather than a milestone or turning point in the debate.

More like a piece of relevant art, though that should not be considered to be to it's detriment. Art as a political tool should not be underestimated, and this guy has created something very powerful.

It scared the hell out of peace and skipy.


Let's hope it's not just the choir who get to hear it and indeed who open their ears to it.