Is it really too much for posters to always be informed in an editing comment and for them to know when any form of imposed censorship has been judged to be necessary? in the opinion of virtually every forum sponsor, moderator, and host on the planet, yes.
especially when you add in "always".
secondly - be definition since the forum owner has the right to delete,edit, move, etc any posting strictly speaking the term "censorship" is invalid.?
Multiple threads combined, and the first thread was undeleted because I could see no reason for deletion. Please remember that this is a thread about Winona Ryder, not about Mudcat Editing Policy.
That's it. The End. Finis. Schluss.
No further discussion of anything but Winona Ryder will be permitted in this thread. -Joe Offer-