Can't, Clint - It's been there too long:-)

Not a good answer though. As the Python sketch said - This isn't argument it's just abuse. So how about a proper Hammond reasoned argument?

You say there is no such this as an exteme skeptic. I have offered my proof that there is. The evidence being presented using your good self as an example. The usual ploy now is to refute the proof by offering an alternative. How's about it? And please remember The plural of "evidence" is neither "anecdote" nor "tradition" . I would also add that evidence does not comprise of repetition or abuse.

I am, as I have already said, a confirmed skeptic myself and, as you point out, in the light of new evidence I am willing to change my mind. Are you willing to either provide that new evidence or, maybe, change your own mind?

Cheers

DtG