Thanks for your responses to my questions, Shambles.

On the one hand they show how crooked your thinking is (your responses to the questions 2-4 make close to no sense in the context of your argumentation regarding question 1) on the other hand you are invited to hold these opinions.

But if for instance the clones would have let each of these threads stay refreshed by inserting a comment about the action I would have protested. I would have hated to open a dozen music threads from old time just to find that the only new addition to that thread was a note by a clone that a post containing spam has been eliminated.

Your response to question 2 BTW is so silly and absurd that even you should acknowledge that it was over the top. The most I have seen were 6 spam mails to on thread (there may have been more). And you want each single elimination in that thread being commented upon? Like:

last post (from 2002)
spam post eliminated (clone A)
spam post eliminated (clone B)
spam post eliminated (clone A)
spam post eliminated (clone C)
spam post eliminated (clone B)

You really would object to a sentence like "six spam posts eliminated"? Or did you not understand the implication of my formulation of question 2 and did fail to grasp what you were supporting in your response?

You can bang your head, you can send more PMs, you can repeat your question of the last paragraph as often as you want, my communication regarding that matter is closed.

Wolfgang