Subject: RE: BS: Mudcat censorship - a proposal
From: Big Mick - PM
Date: 02 Apr 05 - 08:31 PM

The alteration it needs must occur in the minds of the folks that respond to this stuff. Roger is entitled to his opinion, and in virtually every posters response they have indicated they are tired of his restating the same thing over and over; they are tired of him twisting quotes to serve himself; they go on and on about how he goes on and on. Do you folks learn anything? Who is worse, Roger or you? The question to Roger about who is "we" has been asked over and over.

Roger isn't the problem anymore. Those that feed him are.
Mick
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So posters - you can see that (according to Mick) it is not me or our 'moderators' who are the problem - but you. I wish I had a pound for every one of Mick's posts to these threads - since he posted that one. I would be very wealthy indeed.

The point is that poster do still have the right to post their views and just being judged irritating, not to your taste or making any other judgement of a poster's worth does meet - even the ever varying criteria to restrict or prevent their posting.

So no 'moderator' should be seen to be taking part, encouraging or even turning a blind eye to such things on our forum.

The only options open to posters (and 'moderators) are to ignore threads and posts that are not to their taste - or for them to post elsewhere.