Mr. Bill D,

Okay, we are philosophically going to disagree on this one issue. My point is, in my opinion, and based on my values alone, Hillary would have put her self-respect, honor, and potential professional aspirations ahead of her marriage if she had the moral character I want to see in someone seeking that high an office.

Bill Clinton is in the same liar's category as Nixon (whom I voted for and later regretted because of his revealed deep flaws) Clinton is unworthy of any moral acclaim. He did well with the budget and with foreign affairs mainly because of his Cabinet. In addition, I think people often put charisma ahead of what really matters, at least to me, for someone in high office; honor, integrity, honesty, the ability of admit mistakes, and the self-respect not succumb to the most basic of human temptations while in a position of trust. The end does not justify the means, especially in this case.

My definition of a sexual creep would include anyone who would penetrate any woman vaginally with a cigar in the Oval Office (Clinton demeaned it to the "Oral" Office). In addition, remember that the oral sex, including oral-anal sex, was not a one-time spur of the moment "weak moment". It happened about 9 times according to sworn testimony.

Therefore, if Hillary is willing to stay married to a creep like Bill Clinton she does not have the moral fiber or self-respect to hold high office.

I would take a Jimmy Carter anytime, any day, over a Bill or Hillary Clinton.