As I've mused before, if you write interesting/amusing,
stuff, and debate vaguely properly,it'll stay in.

Like Catspaw's posts that stay in - containing only foul and abusive scatological insults you mean?

Is musing the same thing as reasoning? I think not.

Yes you have implied this before - and despite the clear facts that the only deciding factor is WHO is saying it - not what is said - you still ignore these facts - and you go on to imply it again.

I fail to see that ignoring the facts can be thought to be debating properly - even vagely.

Do you accept that had you contributed to the Status Quo, Winona Ryder threads - the one that has vanished without trace and the Kate Rusby split threads - that no matter how 'interesting/amusing' your post may have been - it would have been deleted - even though your post would not have met the required criteria, that you were assured on this thread it would need to, in order to be deleted?