Are you not a bit puzzled? Some of us certainly seem to be a bit confused.

For when it was wrongly assumed that Max had actually stopped me from posting – the following (rather touching) plea to Max, for my re-instatement was made. As Max had not done such a thing - this favoured poster is then not prevented - but is seen to be permitted and encouraged by the Current Chief of the Mudcat Editing Team to continue their insulting posting and name-calling on our forum. Seemingly in a futile attempt to drive me away. Only proving that every thing claimed in this threa, about the example set of unfair, inconsistent and personally motivated action and perferentual treatment by (some of) our 'moderators' is perfectly true.   

Subject: RE: From Max: State of the Union Address
From: catspaw49 - PM
Date: 12 May 06 - 11:15 AM
>snip<
My bad of course for messing with Roger. He doesn't see he's been messing with us for years, but.........And to some degree, your bad too. He's used an old quote hundreds of times and I know you'd like to have it that way (no rules) but it doesn't work once a site grows past a certain point which Mudcat has. Responding to Roger earlier might have saved some of this. I dunno'......So how about reinstating Roger and I'll agree to quit messing with him? Just ask him to back-off the campaign against Joe. No more censorship complaints. If he understands that we are all playing under the same rules perhaps......maybe he might........well its worth a shot isn't it? Roger has written some beautiful poetry and songs and staying in that vein, he needs to be a part of this community.