Little Hawk, read your post of 09 Dec 06 - 03:12 PM.

What you were asked was the following:

What do you believe? Is Iran pursuing nuclear power as a means of securing peaceful energy or nuclear weapons? You failed to answer.

On a number of occasions in the past when threatened with annihilation from its neighbours Israel has acted to defend itself. They have done so very successfully and on each occasion they have had ample opportunity to murder and completely destroy their enemies - OK, Little Hawk with all this pent up murderous fury at the Muslin world (which exists only as your rather ridiculous contention) can you explain to me why they never availed themselves of such opportunities and were always ready to accept UN intervention and mediation. This question you also failed to answer.

Now being a keen student of history Little Hawk, you go and find out then come back and tell us who, at the time, was prepared to accept the borders defined by the UN in 1948 and who rejected the UN's proposal and opted for war instead. Another question that you failed to answer.

Proof required from yourself regarding the existence of Israel's stockpile of nuclear weapons - Not addressed - another question you failed to answer.

Also required an admission that the only thing that the revelation that Israel has nuclear weapons would affect would be that the US would not be permitted to export nuclear technological transfer or nuclear materials.

Instead of addressing the questions put to Little Hawk, all of which came from some rather ridiculous contentions of Little Hawk's contained in the posts referred to, Little Hawk chooses to ignore the questions I have raised and has launched into a personal attack. In a number of things Little Hawk, what you say is perfectly correct:

- We do not matter

BUT

- If you are going to discuss things on an Internet Forum, if you make statements please be prepared to defend them.
- If asked questions related to your stated point of view it is good manners to respond.
- If you cannot respond it seriously weakens your credibility and tends to illustrate that your original contentions are best flawed.