Fair enough Slag, we'll agree to disagree. Sorry you find my posts tedious etc., etc., but if you had learned to read properly when you were in school, it wouldn't take you half as long. Don't like it when people make personal attacks? Then don't do it yourself: no need to, if you have a viable argument in the first place. You want to 'isentify' me? There doesn't appear to be any such word, but maybe it's your own private dialect and you are trying to say something like 'annoy'? If so, sorry to disappoint - I only get annoyed with myself when criticised by someone whose opinions I respect. You have plummted in this regard after your last post. I have no problem with someone saying I'm wrong and why, but it's a bit pathetic when they lose it and start making personal attacks - they've moved from hating the idea to hating the person that holds the idea, and that sums up your world view neatly. In this way it simply is not possible for you to be objective about any topic (and you accuse me of bias!!!) It's also as good as admitting you don't have a viable argument.

I was going to point out a few things about what your attitude to Posada / Israel / etc., says about you, but it'd just go straight over your head. So, like I said, we'll agree to disagree and end our dialogue here.