...and if one poster "is seen" to be making life difficult for OTHER posters?

The precedent set by our 'moderators' for a poster who repeatedly posts to call others poster's foul and abusive names is for them to be banned - is it not?.

So if all posters doing this are seen to be treated openly and fairly there will be no problem?

But they are not are they?

A certain favoured poster has now been seen to be encouraged by the current Chief of the Mudcat Editing Team to post and inflict on our forum whatever abuse and scatological references they may wish.

Why do you consider it acceptable for one poster to be banned and the other poster to be free from any censure and encouraged?