Noted GUEST of 03 Jan 07 - 05:51 AM, that you have not challenged anything that I have said, you have not offered any sort of counter arguement whatsoever. What exactly is the point that you are trying to make? Or are you only capable of mounting personal attacks?

Should I get upset about this? Naw, don't think so, although I would have liked to have seen the reaction of those on this forum if I had likened anybody to, how did Guest put it;

"oh-so-diligent civil servants and researchers who furnished the Nazis with their facts and figures to justify the race laws; beavering away at the coalface of obfuscation to furnish enough half-truths to shore up an edifice of pure evil.
Like those good men Falk Ruttke, Arthur Gütt and Ernst Rüdin, he freely gives of his erudition for the benefit of all."

No Guest, far from shoring up any edifice of pure evil, I object mightily when time after time, in thread after thread, the same old left-wing, anti-war, anti-Bush, anti-Blair lies and misrepresentations appear as fact in what is presented as reasoned arguement. When confronted by facts that disprove those dearly held myths, the response is commonly and frighteningly similar to your own, nothing challenged and nothing offered by way of counter arguement, all you are left with is personal attack - on your part that's rather pathetic don't you think?