Dickey--


So sorry, you're wrong again. There has been no shift in my argument.

Feel free to misquote or misinterpret me--somehow I trust you will anyway.

But the fact remains that early in our discussion (19 Jan 2007 10:11 PM) I stated (to Teribus):


"And don't bother to give us your tired idiocies about 'warning about a future possibility, not saying Saddam was responsible for 9-11'. Of course he's (Bush) not spelling out that Saddam was responsible for that. Nobody claims he was. But he is clearly trying to imply that if we don't do something about Saddam--real soon--there will, in the near future, be a similar situation to 9-11. But 'this time armed by Saddam', who, we have been told over and over, is likely to have chemical, biological or nuclear weapons."

That's what I said then. That's still my argument--despite your typically specious- (look it up)- and foolish allegations.

And that Bush quote from the 2003 State of the Union speech is a perfect example of the propaganda campaign--which neither you nor Teribus have produced a scintilla- (look it up)- of evidence to refute.

And please don't bother us with your incredibly feeble "Clinton made me" excuse. Who invaded Iraq? Somehow I don't think it was Clinton.